| |
Undergraduate Honors Students
Graduate Students
Netta Avineri
Netta's project investigates moral reasoning practices within a seventh
grade Reform Jewish Torah School classroom. The study nalyzes
question/response sequences, formulations, and argument strategies
employed by six students, a visitor, and the teacher during a
discussion regarding rules about throwing in class. In the absence of
assessments and social modals, question and response design prove to be
fundamental means to display stance and at times resist explicitly
stated moral principles. Formulations of actions, relevant concepts,
and rules serve as strategic descriptions used by all participants
during the discussion. This study provides evidence for the central
role of moral reasoning and argument within this community of practice,
and demonstrates how pre-adolescents can play a significant part in
their own socialization into the use of these practices.

Annice
Barber
Annice's
Ph.D. dissertation is entitled "Destruction is pretty cool sometimes": The Negotiation
of Morality through Narrative. In this ethnographic
study she analyzes the negotiation of a moral identity for minority urban adolescents
through an examination of communicative practices employed in a community youth
organization. More specifically, through participant observation, conversation
analysis and study of cultural practices, she investigates how teens and adult
leaders communicate to co-construct a framework for judging the morality of
thoughts and actions.
Annice's research site is an inner-city Catholic parish youth group.
Over a 10 month period, she gathered data primarily through video recording
and supplemented this with audio recordings and field notes. She has
collected approximately 110 hours of video and audio data and collected
copies of all materials used for the activities. Activities were observed
in a wide variety of settings including religious services, weekly
meetings, social events (dances, softball games etc), service events
(visiting skid row, mission trip to Jamaica) and retreats. She also
conducted approximately 25 hours of interviews as supplemental ethnographic
data. Through this research she will 1) study moral formation through
everyday talk; 2) study moral construction and action; 3) study moral
formation in a group; and 4) address the impact of community youth
organizations in the formation of a moral self.
See
photo

Ignasi Clemente
Ignasi's
dissertation investigates how pediatric cancer patients use both
verbal and nonverbal communication to accept, resist or
contest everyday treatment
choices during different stages of their cancer treatment in a hospital in
Barcelona, Catalonia. Specifically, he examines the embodied discursive practices
through which children are either included or excluded from the treatment
negotiation, as well as the embodied ways in which children actively
attempt to participate
in it.
In this analysis
he argues that children's questions reveal their knowledge of and
emotions about their cancer and its treatment. In
addition, examining children's questions may offer insight into the
organization of children's agency in these negotiations. Moreover,
children's questions occur in an environment where children find themselves
being routinely talked about, talked on behalf of, and only occasionally
considered as competent interlocutors and interpreters of their own
lives. Thus, Ignasi's aim is to reveal how adults treat children as
non-interactional participants, how the child patient is constituted
as a "non-person," and more significantly, how pediatric
patients actively contest this "non-person" identity. He
explores, from a longitudinal micro-ethnographic perspective, the politics
of children1s cancer treatment, at the intersection of the cultural
constructions of both childhood and patienthood in Catalonia.

Carleen Curley
Carleen's dissertation in Applied
Linguistics is entitled "Developmental Stance Taking in a Japanese
Elementary School." Her study examines the development of stance
taking as exhibited in the linguistic patterns of Japanese elementary
school children from the first until third grades as they engage in
classroom and collaborative activities. Drawing upon research from
language socialization, moral education, child language development,
conversation analysis, and sociocultural activity theory, her
study explores the ways in which pronoun usage, naming practices
and directives, and epistemic training through reported speech are
utilized in classroom interaction in order to better understand how
children learn to treat each other in socially appropriate ways.
Carleen's dissertation contributes to an understanding of the role
of language, cultural variability, and socialization practices in the
development of young children as they engage in elementary school life.
Carleen's primary field site is an elementary school in rural Japan.
Ethnographic data was collected during the 2000-2001 Japanese academic
year while the children were in first grade and follow-up data was
collected while the children were in second grade. Third grade data
was collected in the fall of 2002. Collected data consists
of: 1) over 50 hours of video recordings of classroom interaction and
cultural activities, such as sports festivals and school concerts,
around school; 2) tape recorded interviews with the primary teacher
and vice-principal; 3) field notes based on participant-observation
during class and notes about informal conversations with the primary
teacher after class; and 4) collection of the children's artwork and
letters.

Olga Griswold
Olga's dissertation in Applied Linguistics is entitled
"Becoming a U.S. Citizen: Second Language Socialization in Adult
Citizenship Classrooms." This study examines how, in the course of
classroom interaction, citizenship instructors and prospective
applicants for U.S. citizenship jointly shape and modify their
understandings of what it means to be adequately proficient in English
for the purposes of naturalization. Based on ethnographic observations
conducted for eleven months at two adult schools in Los Angeles, CA, as
well as on the microanalysis of videotaped classroom interactions, Olga
examines the practices through which citizenship applicants are
socialized into linguistic behaviors deemed necessary and sufficient
for the naturalization interview.
This study is qualitative in nature and combines conversation analysis,
ethnography of communication, and the analysis of gesture as its
methodologies. The analysis concentrates on the teacher's feedback on
the students' performance as a vehicle of second language
socialization. First, the sequential organization of instructional
episodes demonstrates that despite the ostensible focus on U.S. history
and government structure, significant attention is given to the
students' linguistic accuracy during activities simulating portions of
the naturalization interview. Students are, thus, socialized into
viewing English proficiency as a practical tool for passing the
interview. Second, highly selective error correction shows that
hearable grammatical accuracy and the ability to decode vocabulary
specific to the topics raised during the naturalization interview are
treated as essential components of adequate English proficiency. Third,
the teacher's feedback on the students' displays of
civics knowledge serves simultaneously as a means of validating
the students' status and competence as long-term U.S. residents and as
a means of reshaping the presentation of such knowledge in ways most
likely to be considered appropriate and acceptable by the officers
conducting the interview.

Jeffrey S. Good
Jeffrey's dissertation in Applied Linguistics is
entitled
"Multitasking and Attention in Interaction: Negotiating Multiple Tasks
in Everyday Family Life." Abstract: Generally, studies of parents'
multitasking behaviors have been accomplished through self-reports and
time diaries. Within that literature, multitasking is understood as
episodes in which people report being engaged in more than one activity
at a time, usually defined as a 'main activity' and a 'secondary
activity'. In my dissertation, I analyze video recordings of naturally
occurring interactions with a focus on working parents' weekday
activities at home, and particularly, parents' multitasking practices.
I suggest that through a closer look at the sequence organization of
activities and how people shift in and out of tasks, we can produce a
more robust definition of multitasking and a deeper analysis of
attention-in-interaction, as well as how multiple activities
concurrently operate. Further, by looking at the range of practices
withing a web of ongoing activities, we see how parents draw attention
to what activities they are engaged in and how they assign priority to
certain activities over others. The analyses I present suggest that
time, attention, and activity-type are important aspects of an emergent
model of multitasking.
The four goals of this dissertation are: (1) compare and
contrast findings from the CELF corpus of vide-recorded materials of
parents' everyday practices with other corpora based on surveys and
time diaries, (2) provide a sequential analysis of attention and joint
attention in interaction and discuss the implications of these enalyses
on the way we view interaction, (3) provide a sequential analysis of
multitasking in everyday interaction and broaden our knowledge about
what constitutes multitasking in human interaction and how it can be
analyzed, and (4) develop a model of multitasking. In sum, my
dissertation has many goals, all of which will contribute new findings
to several related fields of research.

Namhee Han
Namhee Han’s dissertation
(co-chaired with Alison Bailey) is entitled “Language
Socialization of Korean-American Preschoolers: Becoming a Member of a
Community Beyond the Family.” Her work investigates child
language socialization practices in the Korean-American preschool
classroom using ethnographic methods and an in-depth analysis of
verbal/non-verbal interaction. She found that various forms of
directives were a primary tool teachers used to promote compliance and
obedience (e.g. explicit or implicit prompting of social etiquette
words and honorific answers, sing-song requests, and disciplinary
directives). Teasing was employed to playfully point to child’s
learning errors whereas in shaming, social control of a child’s
behavior was the major purpose.
Certain vocabulary emerged as a socialization tool (e.g. age-graded
terms to teach age appropriate behaviors, or to shame immature
behaviors; affect-loaded words to express approval and disapproval of
child’s verbal/non-verbal behaviors). Preschool teachers
presented social norms in the form of reminder (‘Social
Rule’ + ‘Tag Question’) or statement of
teacher’s preferences or dispreferences (“Teacher
likes/dislikes those who do X”).

Rosamina Lowi
Rosamina's dissertation in Applied
Linguistics is titled "Building Understanding through Language and
Interaction: Joint Attention, Social Modals and Directives in
Adult-Directed Speech to Children in Two Preschools." Making use of
videotaped records and participant observation in two preschools (in
the US and the UK) this dissertation investigates how adults and
children in a preschool setting negotiate meaning and build
understanding through language. Using discourse analysis, Dr. Lowi
investigates processes of establishing joint attention and the
utilization of social modals and pronouns by participants. She examines
how adults use directives to socialize children into appropriate
behaviors, and how establishing joint attention was crucial for
achieving preferred responses. A multi-vocal ethnography was conducted
to explore the attitudes of teachers at two distinct research
sites.

Bayard Lyons
Bayard's dissertation (co-directed by Sondra Hale) focuses on the psychological
and socio-cultural processes by which adolescents negotiate a sense of social
and moral responsibility as they make the transition from childhood to adulthood.
Specifically, he is interested in analyzing the cross-cultural variation in
the dynamic relationship between historical, social, and cultural authoritative
discourses and the evolution of consciousness in adolescence (Bakhtin, 1981).
While Bayard focuses on male adolescents and masculinity, he is interested
in the intersection of gender relationships and moral and social responsibility.
Understanding adolescent development to be an open-ended process in which adolescents
both shape and are shaped by the larger social forces as they negotiate identity,
Bayard's dissertation research focuses on understanding how the force of adolescence
arises out of the cultural context of Turkish northern Cyprus and how this
has changed since 1960.
Taking Benedict Anderson's concept of imagined communities, Bayard
argues that adolescents make the transition into adulthood by negotiating
a sense of self in relation to competing moral communities. One's negotiation
of moral communities is parallel to the negotiation of multiple avenues
open to adolescents as they negotiate identity. Possible moral communities
in relation to which an adolescent negotiates a sense of moral and
social responsibility might include family, nation, religion and community
related to ethnic identity. Within the last 40 years in northern Cyprus,
the predominant moral communities have been the family, the nation
and ethnic groups. Bayard's research explores how Cypriot adolescents
negotiate their relationship to these three moral communities or create
alternative moral communities in light of the social, cultural and
historical forces from the 1960's to the present.
See
photo

Lauren Mason Carris
Lauren's dissertation in
Applied Linguistics (chaired with H. Samy Alim) is titled, "Protecting and Serving Outcast
Communities": Performance Narratives in the Chicana/o Verbal Art Genre
of Teatro. This project examines the connections between Chicana/o
performance, performativity, and the performance of identities within
the context of Chicana/o Teatro.
As an ethnographic study of Chicana/o verbal art, this project focuses
on the critical social commentary of Los Angeles-based sketch comedy
troupe, Chicano Secret Service, focusing on actos
(short one-act plays), to provide insight into the multiple semiotic
resources used to fashion Chicana/o identities and reinforce,
negotiate, and/or subvert expected linguistic and cultural norms. My
analysis of Chicana/o performance and performativity is informed by a
linguistic anthropological theoretical perspective that focuses on the
identity work accomplished through the convergence of stance and style
as well as the situated performance of language ideologies, providing
an integrated, multifaceted approach to understanding how Chicana/os
understand and position ourselves vis-à-vis Dominant culture.
Consistent with new trends in
Chicana/o and Latina/o studies, this project incorporates perspectives
that center and re-articulate the experiences of the largest "minority"
group in the United States. By incorporating a variety of data sources
(video-taped performances, performance transcripts, video- and
audio-taped interviews, fieldnotes, and observations) and theoretical
frameworks (critical, applied, interactional and linguistic analysis,
ethnography of communication, triangulation with consultants) this
study moves beyond the rhetorical and textual analyses of performance
(Belgrad 2004; Broyles-Gonzalez 1994; Holling & Calafell 2007;
Velasco 2002; Ybarra-Fausto 1991) into a new era of research that
privileges language and iteraction as a site for exploring identity.
Understanding the intersection between
stance, style, and language ideologies through this approach provides a
better understanding of Chicana/o performativity, that illuminates the
ways in which performers construct and reconstruct nosotros y los otros,
ourselves and others, further illustrating the agency of informants,
not as objects, but as subjects who are capable of theorizing their own
practice, positioning Chicana/os as critical social actors with a great
deal to say on and off the stage (Calafell 2004, 2005; de la Garza 2004; Willis 1997; García 2006).

Mee-Jeong Park
Mee-Jeong Park’s dissertation,
The Meaning of Korean Prosodic Boundary Tones, was co-chaired
with Sun-ah Jun. It examines how speakers use prosodic boundary tones
to achieve particular communicative goals in Korean. More
particularly, this study claims that speakers use boundary tones to
accomplish a wide variety of communicative goals that cannot
often be achieved through other means such as syntax and word
choice. These additional communicative goals include: (a) enhance
the semantic meaning of morphosyntactic forms (b) stance toward
prepositional content (e.g., attitude, certainty of knowledge); (c)
stance toward addressee (e.g., degree of social solidarity); and (d)
discourse organization (e.g., marking the boundaries of reported
speech).

Laurie Schick
Laurie's dissertation in Applied Linguistics, entitled "Language
Socialization from Modality to Morality," investigates how modal language (i.e., language which gives directions,
makes
judgments, expresses emotions and opinions, and formulates hypotheses and
plans) can be used to socialize moral reasoning and conduct among older
children and
adolescents. The dissertation investigates the following interrelated
hypotheses: (a) that moral reasoning and behavior need to be understood
as dependent upon
other broader social and cognitive skills such as social planning and abstract
reasoning; (b) that these skills can be promoted through language socialization
practices, and (c) that this kind of socialization can and does take place
much later in a child's development than has been assumed heretofore.
Laurie's field site is a Los Angeles area public middle school. She
has collected data there using three basic methods: (1) the videotaping
of naturally-occurring interactions among teachers and students engaged
in dance lessons (over 120 hours including three dance classes and
one drama class); (2) the taking of field notes based on participant-observation
during formal class time and during informal conversations taking place
between class and during recess and lunch periods (over a period of
three semesters); and (3) the collection of artifacts (generally in
the form of photocopies and photographs) such as lesson plans, student
journal entries, performance programs, and student art projects. Analysis of the data used linguistic,
discourse, and ethnographic methods.
|
|