Abstract for On Integrity in Inquiry. . . of the Investigated, not the Investigator
Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On Integrity in
Inquiry...of the investigated, not the
investigator. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 455-80.
The article begins with a sketch of the relation
of interaction to language and to culture, and of
the students of interaction to the students of
language and of culture. A 10-second segment of
recorded interaction at a family dinner is then
examined in a fashion meant to preserve the
integrity of what is being done interactionally
while incorporating attention to the deployment of
various facets of the language that is used, and
its relationship to simultaneously ongoing bodily
doings. An interactional practice – whining – from
that episode is then juxtaposed with the same
practice in several other segments of interaction
in the interests of developing a more formal,
transsituational account. The viability of
research focused on phenomena in an analytically
distinct domain of events while preserving the
integrity of the occasions in which instances of
the phenomenon occurred is then reviewed, using a
case study of the conjoint use of phonetic
analysis and conversation analysis. The article
concludes with a reply to Levinson’s article in
this special issue of the journal, and uses the
occasion to sketch the relationship between
interaction and so-called ‘macro’ social and
cultural formations such as kinship.
Close window