Lecture 3: The Soviet Union

State, Government and Economy

Topics

      The “state” consisted of legislatures at every administrative level called Sovety (“Councils”) that were chosen in uncontested elections and obeyed Party guidance

      The “government” consisted of ministries mostly administering specialized industries

      The “economy” was owned by the state, operated by the government except in most farming, and produced according to central directives called “Five-Year Plans” which were however not plans but commands

 

The State

      National legislature was called the Supreme Soviet of the USSR

  Verkhovnyi Sovet, literally “Upper Council”: vverkh means “upward”

      Each Union Republic also had a Supreme Soviet

      Every lower ranking entity – province, city, district – also had a soviet

Uncontested Elections

      Party officials working for the first secretary ruling each territorial subdivisions picked a slate of candidates to represent the “indestructible bloc of communists and non-party persons” (bespartiinii, “without-party-ish”)

      Each candidate was elected by a simple majority from a single-member district

      Each won with nearly unanimous support

 

Voting procedure

      All adults were eligible to vote

      Persons wanting to vote for the candidate showed their identification (known as a “passport,” but for movement within the country only), picked up a paper ballot, and dropped it into an urn

      Anyone wanting to vote against showed identification, took the ballot into a screened area, crossed out the candidate’s name, and dropped the marked ballot into the urn

      “No” voters were instantly identifiable

Turnout

      Turnout was always recorded as near universal

      No procedure for absentee voting

      Persons absent from their place of residence could not vote and were not counted

      Almost a third of Soviet citizens routinely left town on election day in order to avoid voting

      Actual turnout was about 70 percent

Motivation to Vote

      If everyone knew the vote was a pre-determined charade, why did anyone vote?

      One of the chores of party membership was collecting people to go to the polls

      This provided an opportunity for Soviet subjects to draw official attention to unresolved problems such as the need for repairs to streets or apartment buildings

      More important, after casting ballots voters had the opportunity to buy otherwise scarce foodstuffs and consumer goods delivered to the polling place

      Motivation to vote depended on the state’s near monopoly of the economy

Motivation to Serve

      Election to a Soviet only from the “indestructible bloc” made all Soviets strictly obedient to Party guidance

      The Politburo was the only true legislature

      Why serve without any discretion?

      Deputies to Soviets received privileged access to housing and shops operated by the Soviets, as well as free travel

      Opportunity to perform “case work” for constituents also probably mattered to some

      Government officials were required to answer questions sent by deputies

 

Government

       Union government was headed by a Council of Ministers with a Chairman (Russian predsedatel’,foresitter”) invariably a member of the Politburo

       This was the only title born by (Lenin 1917-22), coupled with the title of General Secretary by Stalin (1929-1953), and added to the title of First Secretary by Khrushchev (57-64)

       Brezhnev (1964-1982) was the first General Secretary not to assume the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers

       None of the three later General Secretaries took this post, whose occupant therefore acquired a degree of independence from the General Secretary

       A Soviet predsedatel is a hierarchical superior able to  give orders, not merely the person recognizing speakers at a meeting

Council of Ministers

      Most ministers headed bureaucracies controlling industries generally specialized by category of product

      Ministry of Agriculture both operated some farms (so-called “state farms”) and bought product from so-called “collective farms” whose chairmen were chosen by territorial party officials; purchasing was later separated into a specialized Ministry of Procurements

      Normal set of other ministries: foreign, defense, interior (police and prisons), a “state committee” called the KGB that operated the political police, justice running criminal courts, education running schools

      From the Khrushchev years onward, the “power ministries” reported directly to a tiny group of the most important Politburo members called under Brezhnev the “Defense Council,” not through the Chairman

Appointment of Ministers and Officials

      Ministers were on the nomenklatura of the Politburo, as were subordinates heading the very largest factories and certain key research laboratories

      Secretariat maintained a huge filing system containing records on all persons holding appointments or eligible for appointment in the future

      Party guidance took the form of “recommendations” that were invariably enacted by the ministers who technically made the appointments

      Together with holders of party offices and deputies to the Soviets and their staffs, government appointees composed the ruling group called nomenklatura after the name of the process used to select them

Gosplan

      A first deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers headed the State Planning Committee Gosplan

      Despite its name Gosplan did no planning

      It issued production quotas summarized in the Five-Year Plan but revised yearly in the annual plan

      Production quotas were set for each ministry

Ministries

      Each ministry took the production quotas delivered by Gosplan and allocated them among the production units subordinate to the ministry

      Production units might consist of factories, research labs, storehouse, railroad or shipping or trucking organizations, farms, warehouses, retail stores, or any others

Gossnab

      A second central office, called the State Supply Committee or Gossnab (originally a subdivision of Gosplan), issued directives to the ministries telling them where to deliver the product ordered by Gosplan

      Ministries subdivided Gossnab directives among their production units

Money and Finance

      Finances play almost no role in transactions among production units: no buying or selling

      All transactions occur by a combination of production orders and delivery orders

      Another state committee called Goskomtsen issued directives to ministries with guidance concerning the assignment of prices to products

      A Ministry of Finances (Minfin) kept track of the price of goods delivered to and from each production unit and of the bank balance for the unit

      But if a production unit went into the red, Minfin simply increased its bank balance

      The production unit director might get reprimanded or even reassigned for failing to stay in the black

Employment and Consumption

      Both males and females were employed almost uniformly in production units of various kinds or were full-time students or military and administrative personnel

      They were paid in cash wages that could be spent in retail stores

      Because wages were regularly increased while prices were deliberately set low and never increased except when new products replaced old, retail shelves were ordinarily empty

      Most purchases were made through the buyer’s production unit

Housing

      Housing consisted of apartment blocks built according to production quotas set by Gosplan for construction ministries

      Once complete, the construction ministries delivered the apartment buildings to local soviets

      Local soviets then assigned the apartments to individuals and families who had applied for new housing

      Shortages meant that large employers often built housing for their employees

      In the Brezhnev era, some apartment blocks were sold to cooperatives that local officials were authorized to organize and that sold membership to individuals who purchased the right to occupy an apartment

      Private housing was otherwise non-existent

Origins of the Command Economy

      When Lenin’s movement seized power in a few Russian cities, its members felt a generalized aversion to private ownership

      Need to mobilize for the ensuing civil war led to confiscation of privately owned factories and to rationing of all goods

      At end of civil war, while retaining ownership of large industry, the Russian communist party also encouraged private enterprise

Composition of the Soviet Population

      Industrial workers whom the communists felt were their natural supporters comprised only 3% of the population

      Upwards of 85 percent were subsistence agriculturalists, or peasants, raising barely enough food to feed their families and to surrender a small surplus

      While Marx and Lenin regarded peasants as potential allies for the working class, they also perceived a political danger

Stalin’s Transformation

      Stalin used this doctrinal ambivalence about peasants to assemble a following of civil war veterans who resented the higher incomes accumulated by the private entrepreneurs or Nepmeny

      Their support enabled him to win a dispute within the Party leadership over economic policy in favor of a new confiscation coupled with dramatic increases in industrial employment

      His decisive victory in 1929 triggered the transformation of Gosplan from a planning to a command agency and the beginning of collectivization

Collectivization

      Land had been nationalized but peasant villages had been encouraged to seize land and decide how to allocate it among their members

      Stalin now ordered all peasants to join collective farms and to surrender their tools, livestock and grains

      Rather than turn over food, they predictably chose to eat it instead

      Lacking horses to pull plows and any incentive to produce a crop that would be confiscated anyway, peasants who had produced barely at the margin of subsistence now found themselves starving instead

Urbanization

      Famine in the countryside gradually drove the peasant population into the cities where they necessarily sought employment first as the construction force and then as the work force in the new factories

      Also, peasants labeled “kulaks” (Russ. kulak, “fist,” slang for a village moneylender) were deported to construction sites in Siberia and the Far North to take advantage of mineral deposits

      Between 1930 and 1985 a population that had been about 85 percent rural became about 70 percent urban

An “Economy”?

      An economy converts raw materials into finished products

      Vast expansion over time in the quantity of finished products of various types

      An economy performs conversion by buying and selling

      In principle, no buying or selling among production units

      Buying and selling were confined to the marginal retail interactions between consumers and the state and even more marginal sales of private production, primarily food

      It hardly matters whether the Soviet system is called an economy

      It is important not to allow the term “economy” to confuse

Economic Growth?

      In a market economy, economic growth occurs when the value of production increases

      Production has value when it is sold

      Additions to unsold inventory reduce economic growth by adding to warehousing costs

      Since the majority of Soviet product was unsold, was its expansion growth?

Drawbacks of Command Production

      Gosplan needed to balance quotas for raw materials and semifabricates and quotas for transportation against quotas for finished product

      As quantity and assortment of finished product increased, balancing became more difficult

      Imbalances were resolved by development of technically illegal barter among production units encouraged by Party administrators for leverage

      Bigger problem is perverse effects of measurement units

Perverse Consequences of Quotas

       Quotas must be expressed in some units

       Suppose a factory making windows is told to produce a certain number of square meters of glass

       Then it is easiest to produce the quota by making very thin glass, but the resulting windows break

       Gosplan shifted to ordering the factories to produce a certain weight of glass

       Then it is easiest to produce the weight by making very thick windows

       They were too thick to fit the frames produced by a woodworking factory

       All over old Soviet buildings, window glass is puttied into wood frames with slots that have been broken out to make the window fit

       Specifying the units as both weight and thickness doesn’t resolve the problem either because the number of instructions becomes too large for the central office to formulate in time

Perverse Consequences of Universal Employment

      All persons were required to be employed or to be studying

      Unemployment was a crime known as “parasitism”

      Being a crime, loss of employment was ordinarily imposed only for political dissent as a preliminary to charges of parasitism, often accompanied by accusations of rape

      Since one could not lose one’s job and since promotions were a reward for political loyalty, what was the incentive for most people to work hard?

      Work effort was low and much product was deficient to the point of being inoperable