CODEBOOK Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft 234 cases Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page i CONTENTS item page CASEID Caseid 1 VAR001 Sample community 1 VAR002 Respondent ID 1 VAR003 Have you heard about Parkfield earthquake prediction? - 1 2 VAR004 Have you heard about Parkfield earthquake prediction? - 2 2 VAR005 Expected magnitude scale for prediction - Magnitude scale 2 VAR006 Expected magnitude - Magnitude 6 3 VAR007 Expected magnitude - Magnitude 7 3 VAR008 Expected magnitude - Any magnitude 3 VAR009 Expected magnitude - Magnitude accurate 4 VAR010 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 1 4 VAR011 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 2 4 VAR012 Expected magnitude - on location - 1 5 VAR013 Expected magnitude - on location - 2 5 VAR014 Expected magnitude - on location - 3 5 VAR015 Expected magnitude - on location - 4 6 VAR016 Expected magnitude - on location - 5 6 VAR017 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 3 6 VAR018 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 4 7 VAR019 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 6 7 VAR020 Expected magnitude - probability - 1 7 VAR021 Expected magnitude - probability - 2 8 VAR022 Expected magnitude - probability - 3 8 VAR023 Expected magnitude - any probability 8 VAR024 Expected earthquake - scientific consenus 9 VAR025 Expected earthquake - when? 9 VAR026 Expected earthquake - "all of the above" 9 VAR027 Earthquake advise - store food and water 10 VAR028 Earthquake advice - learn first aid 10 VAR029 Earthquake advice - have first aid kit available 10 VAR030 Earthquake advice - maintain supply of needed meds 11 VAR031 Earthquake advice - family emergency plan 11 VAR032 Earthquake advice - if indoors, stay indoors 11 VAR033 Earthquake advice - get under a table 12 VAR034 Earthquake advice - if outside, get clear 12 VAR035 Earthquake advice - have flashlight handy 12 VAR036 Earthquake advice - Have and use portable radio 13 VAR037 Earthquake advice - Have heavy gloves and wrench 13 VAR038 Earthquake advice - Turn off Utilities 13 VAR039 Earthquake advice - Hang up phone 14 VAR040 Earthquake advice - Don't use phone except for injury 14 VAR041 Earthquake advice - Learn how to prevent fires 14 VAR042 Earthquake advice - Keep fire extinguisher handy 15 February 16, 2006 Page ii Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft item page VAR043 Earthquake advice - heavy objects off high shelfs. 15 VAR044 Earthquake advice - Don't use vehicle unless in emergency 15 VAR045 Earthquake advice - Anchor house to foundation 16 VAR046 Earthquake advice - Buy earthquake insurance 16 VAR047 Earthquake advice - Strap down hot water heater 16 VAR048 Earthquake advice - Protect dishes and glassware 17 VAR049 Earthquake advice - Secure heavy furniture to walls 17 VAR050 Earthquake advice - Where to get more equake info 17 VAR051 Earthquake advice - Form neighborhood watch groups 18 VAR052 Earthquake advice - Study emergency plan at work 18 VAR053 Earthquake advice - Study child's school's emergency plan 18 VAR054 Total mitigation choices (var 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) 19 VAR055 Total preparedness choices(vars 1-16, 18, 24-27) 20 VAR056 Total guidance choices 21 VAR057 Warning time 22 VAR058 Warning source - State/Local officials 22 VAR059 Warning medium - Over radio/TV/Newspapers 22 VAR060 Warning - Telephone hotline number will be provided 23 VAR061 Warning followed by other info on radio/TV/Newspapers 23 VAR062 Warning will likely be cancelled within 72 hours 23 VAR063 Warning - Several 72 hour warnings will be issued 24 VAR064 Warning - total number 24 VAR065 Inter message consistency - 1 25 VAR066 Inter message consistency - 2 25 VAR067 How easy to understand all prediction information - 1 26 VAR068 How easy to understand all prediction information - 2 26 VAR069 Information channel for prediction - TV 26 VAR070 Information channel for prediction - Radio 27 VAR071 Information channel for prediction - Newspaper 27 VAR072 Information channel for prediction - Magazines 27 VAR073 Information channel for prediction - Brochures 28 VAR074 Information channel for prediction - Posters 28 VAR075 Information channel for prediction - Meetings 28 VAR076 Information channel for prediction - Reports 29 VAR077 Information channel for prediction - Books 29 VAR078 Information channel for prediction - Informal conversation 29 VAR079 Number of information channels for prediction 30 VAR080 Source of prediction information - Familiar source 30 VAR081 Source of prediction information - Government source 30 VAR082 Source of prediction information - Scientist 31 VAR083 Source of prediction information - Other 31 VAR084 Source of prediction information - Red Cross 31 VAR085 Source of prediction information - Media organization 32 VAR086 Number of sources of prediction information 32 VAR087 Future information source - First mention 33 VAR088 Future information source - Second mention 34 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page iii item page VAR089 Future information source - Third mention 35 VAR090 Future information source - Fourth mention 36 VAR091 Preferred future information source - First mention 37 VAR092 Preferred future information source - Second mention 38 VAR093 Preferred future information source - Third mention 39 VAR094 Preferred future information source - Fourth mention 40 VAR095 How easy to understand brochure sent to home - 1 40 VAR096 How easy to understand brochure sent to home - 2 41 VAR097 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 1 41 VAR098 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 2 42 VAR099 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 3 43 VAR100 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 4 44 VAR101 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 5 44 VAR102 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 6 45 VAR103 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 7 45 VAR104 Should scientists continue prediction work? - 1 45 VAR105 Should scientists continue prediction work? - 2 46 VAR106 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 1 46 VAR107 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 2 47 VAR108 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 3 47 VAR109 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 4 48 VAR110 What magnitude do you predict quake will be? - 1 48 VAR111 What magnitude do you predict quake will be? - 2 49 VAR112 How far will your house be from epicenter? (miles) 49 VAR113 Likelihood of future earthquake event - 1 (For Parkfield) 49 VAR114 Likelihood of future earthquake event - 2 (For other) 50 VAR115 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 1 50 VAR116 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 2 50 VAR117 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 3 51 VAR118 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 4 51 VAR119 Information acquisition items selected (V115-117) 51 VAR120 Response before - acquire info from Government 52 VAR121 Response before - acquire info from Non-government 52 VAR122 Response before - acquired info by talking to people 52 VAR123 Response before - bought earthquake insurance 53 VAR124 Response before - cancelled or delayed big purchases 53 VAR125 Response before - cancelled or delayed investments 53 VAR126 Response before - saved more money 54 VAR127 Response before - secured items in house 54 VAR128 Response before - made house more earthquake resistant 54 VAR129 Response before - stockpiled emergency supplies 55 VAR130 Response before - developed family emergency plan 55 VAR131 Response before - formed neighborhood watch 55 VAR132 Response before - other community activity 56 VAR133 Response before - got info on preparedness response 56 VAR134 Response before - learned first aid 56 February 16, 2006 Page iv Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft item page VAR135 Response before - Information scale (V120-122) 57 VAR136 Response before - mitigation scale (V123-128) 57 VAR137 Response before - preparedness scale (V129-134) 58 VAR138 Number of responses before hearing prediction 58 VAR139 Response after - acquire infro from government 59 VAR140 Response after - acquire info from non-government 59 VAR141 Response after - acquired info by talking to people 59 VAR142 Response after - bought earthquake insurance 60 VAR143 Response after - cancelled or delayed big purchases 60 VAR144 Response after - cancelled or delayed investments 60 VAR145 Response after - saved more money 61 VAR146 Response after - secured items in house 61 VAR147 Response after - made house more earthquake resistant 61 VAR148 Response after - stockpiled emergency supplies 62 VAR149 Response after - developed family emergency plan 62 VAR150 Response after - formed neighborhood watch 62 VAR151 Response after - other community activity 63 VAR152 Response after - got info on preparedness response 63 VAR153 Response after - learned first aid 63 VAR154 Response after - Information scale (V139-141) 64 VAR155 Response after - mitigation scale (V142-147) 64 VAR156 Response after - preparedness scale (V148-153) 65 VAR157 Number of response after hearing prediction 65 VAR158 Do you know anyone who has done anything to prepare 66 VAR159 Do you feel your household is adequately prepared 66 VAR160 Do you feel your community is adequately prepared 66 VAR161 Experience with 1966 Parkfield earthquake 67 VAR162 Experience with 1983 Coalinga eqarthquake 67 VAR163 Have you experience earthquake except '66 or '83? 67 VAR164 Number of years since earthquake (not '66 or '83) occured? 68 VAR165 Impact of non '66 or '83 earthquake 69 VAR166 Experience will ALL earthquakes 69 VAR167 Experience with any other natural disaster - type 70 VAR168 Number of years since experience with other natural disaster 71 VAR169 Damage to builing in other natural disaster 72 VAR170 Sex 72 VAR171 Do you own or rent your place of residence 72 VAR172 Excluding self, how many people in HH responsible for - 1 73 VAR173 Excluding self, how many people in HH responsible for - 2 73 VAR174 Besides own HH, how many family members in community - 1 74 VAR175 Besides own HH, how many family members in community - 2 75 VAR176 Number of local organizations you participate in - 1 75 VAR177 Number of local organizations you participate in - 2 76 VAR178 How many years have you lived in your community - 1 76 VAR179 How many years have you lived in your community - 2 76 VAR180 Occupation of family's chief wage earner 77 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page v item page VAR181 Education 78 VAR182 Ethnicity - 1 78 VAR183 Ethnicity - 2 79 VAR184 Age (in years) 79 VAR185 Age (over/under 60) 79 VAR186 Age (over/under 25) 80 VAR187 Age (<25 and/or >=65) 80 VAR188 Age (over/under 64) 80 VAR189 Gross Household income (in dollars) 81 VAR190 Gross Household income (over/under $15K) 81 VAR191 Can phychics/fortune tellers predict earthquakes? - 1 81 VAR192 Can psychics/fortune tellers predict earthquakes? - 2 82 VAR193 Can psychics/fortune tellers predice earthquakes? - 3 82 VAR194 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 1 82 VAR195 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 2 83 VAR196 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 3 83 February 16, 2006 Page vi Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 1 CASEID Caseid 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 705 MD Codes: none Decimals: 0 Max: 938 Input location: 1/1-3 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR001 Sample community PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Coalinga 0.0 0 2 Paso Robles 100.0 234 3 Taft --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 3 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/4 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR002 Respondent ID 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 3001 MD Codes: none Decimals: 0 Max: 3568 Input location: 1/5-8 February 16, 2006 Page 2 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR003 Have you heard about Parkfield earthquake prediction? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 28.7 64 1 No 6.7 15 2 Don't Know 64.6 144 3 Yes 11 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/9 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR004 Have you heard about Parkfield earthquake prediction? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 35.4 79 0 Don't Know or No 64.6 144 1 Yes 11 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/10 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR005 Expected magnitude scale for prediction - Magnitude scale PCT N VALUE LABEL 53.0 124 1 No e'quake magnitude selected 27.4 64 2 Only one magnitude (6 or 7) selected 19.7 46 3 Magnitude 6 and 7 both selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/11 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 3 VAR006 Expected magnitude - Magnitude 6 PCT N VALUE LABEL 63.2 148 0 Magnitude 6 WAS NOT selected 36.8 86 1 Magnitude 6 WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/12 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR007 Expected magnitude - Magnitude 7 PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.1 164 0 Magnitude 7 WAS NOT selected 29.9 70 1 Magnitude 7 WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/13 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR008 Expected magnitude - Any magnitude PCT N VALUE LABEL 53.0 124 0 No magnitude was selected 47.0 110 1 Any magnitude or magnitude combination was selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/14 February 16, 2006 Page 4 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR009 Expected magnitude - Magnitude accurate PCT N VALUE LABEL 80.3 188 0 Any response except both 6 and 7 being selected 19.7 46 1 Both magnitude 6 and 7 were selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/15 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR010 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 1 Neither "building damage" category selected 0.4 1 2 This mag 6 quake probaly won't cause buiding damage selected 14.1 33 3 This mag 7 quake probably will damage buildings selected 13.2 31 4 Both 6 won't cause and 7 will cause buiding damage selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/16 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR011 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 1 Neither building damage code selected 14.5 34 2 Mag 6 won't OR mag 7 will cause damage selected 13.2 31 3 Mag 6 won't AND mag 7 will both selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/17 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 5 VAR012 Expected magnitude - on location - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 43.6 102 1 Neither mag 6 will be felt nor mag 7 will affect selected 20.9 49 2 Only mag 6 will be felt selected 6.4 15 3 Only mag 7 will affect was selected 29.1 68 4 Both felt/affect choices selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/18 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR013 Expected magnitude - on location - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 43.6 102 1 No felt/affect category selected 27.4 64 2 This mag 6 will be felt or mag 7 will affect selected 29.1 68 3 Both mag 6 will be felt and mag 7 will affect were selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/19 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR014 Expected magnitude - on location - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 50.0 117 0 Mag 6 will be felt NOT selected 50.0 117 1 Mag 6 will be felt WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/20 February 16, 2006 Page 6 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR015 Expected magnitude - on location - 4 PCT N VALUE LABEL 64.5 151 0 Mag 7 will affect NOT selected 35.5 83 1 Mag 7 will affect WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/21 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR016 Expected magnitude - on location - 5 PCT N VALUE LABEL 43.6 102 0 No felt or affect choice was selected 56.4 132 1 Either/both mag 6 felt and/or mag 7 will affect selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/22 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR017 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 86.3 202 0 Mag 6 probably won't cause damage to buildings NOT selected 13.7 32 1 Mag 6 probably won't cause damage to buildings selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/23 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 7 VAR018 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 4 PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.6 170 0 Mag 7 proably will damage buildings NOT selected 27.4 64 1 Mag 7 proably will damage buildings WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/24 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR019 Expected magnitude - on buildings - 6 PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 0 Neither mag 6 won't damage nor mag 7 will damage selected 27.8 65 1 Either/both mag 6 won't damage and/or mag 7 will selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/25 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR020 Expected magnitude - probability - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 69.2 162 1 No earthquake probability choice waas selected 14.1 33 2 Only mag 6 quake has 90% chance of happening selected 1.7 4 3 Only mag 7 quake has 10% chance of happening selected 15.0 35 4 Both probability choices selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/26 February 16, 2006 Page 8 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR021 Expected magnitude - probability - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.9 166 0 Mag 6 quake has 90% chance of happening NOT selected 29.1 68 1 Mag 6 quake has a 90% chance of happening WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/27 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR022 Expected magnitude - probability - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 83.3 195 0 Mag 7 quake has 10% chance NOT selected 16.7 39 1 Mag 7 quake has 10% chance WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/28 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR023 Expected magnitude - any probability PCT N VALUE LABEL 69.2 162 0 No probability choice was selected 30.8 72 1 Either/both mag 6 has 90% chance and/or mag 7 has 10% chance --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/29 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 9 VAR024 Expected earthquake - scientific consenus PCT N VALUE LABEL 64.1 150 0 Quake scientists agree about prediction NOT selected 35.9 84 1 Quake scientists agree about prediction WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/30 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR025 Expected earthquake - when? PCT N VALUE LABEL 77.4 181 0 Regardless of size, will happen by '93 NOT selected 22.6 53 1 Regardless of size, will happen by '93 WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/31 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR026 Expected earthquake - "all of the above" PCT N VALUE LABEL 88.5 207 0 "All of the above" NOT selected 11.5 27 1 "All of the above" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/32 February 16, 2006 Page 10 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR027 Earthquake advise - store food and water PCT N VALUE LABEL 39.3 92 0 "Store food and water" NOT selected 60.7 142 1 Store food and water WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/33 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR028 Earthquake advice - learn first aid PCT N VALUE LABEL 44.0 103 0 "Learn first aid" NOT selected 56.0 131 1 "Learn first aid" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/34 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR029 Earthquake advice - have first aid kit available PCT N VALUE LABEL 41.0 96 0 "Have first aid kit available" NOT selected 59.0 138 1 "Have first aid kit available" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/35 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 11 VAR030 Earthquake advice - maintain supply of needed meds PCT N VALUE LABEL 47.4 111 0 "Maintain emergency supply of meds" NOT selected 52.6 123 1 "Maintain emergency supply of meds" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/36 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR031 Earthquake advice - family emergency plan PCT N VALUE LABEL 43.6 102 0 "Develop family emergency plan" NOT selected 56.4 132 1 "Develop family emergency plan" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/37 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR032 Earthquake advice - if indoors, stay indoors PCT N VALUE LABEL 42.7 100 0 "If indoors, stay indoors" NOT selected 57.3 134 1 "If indoors, stay indoors" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/38 February 16, 2006 Page 12 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR033 Earthquake advice - get under a table PCT N VALUE LABEL 39.7 93 0 "Get under table/desk when quake" NOT selected 60.3 141 1 "Get under table/desk when quake" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/39 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR034 Earthquake advice - if outside, get clear PCT N VALUE LABEL 38.0 89 0 "If outdoors, get clear" NOT selected 62.0 145 1 "If outdoors, get clear" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/40 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR035 Earthquake advice - have flashlight handy PCT N VALUE LABEL 38.9 91 0 "Have a flashlight handy" NOT selected 61.1 143 1 "Have a flashlight handy" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/41 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 13 VAR036 Earthquake advice - Have and use portable radio PCT N VALUE LABEL 41.9 98 0 "Have and use portable radio" NOT selected 58.1 136 1 "Have and use portable radio" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/42 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR037 Earthquake advice - Have heavy gloves and wrench PCT N VALUE LABEL 50.0 117 0 "Have heavy gloves and wrench" NOT selected 50.0 117 1 "Have heavy gloves and wrench" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/43 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR038 Earthquake advice - Turn off Utilities PCT N VALUE LABEL 39.7 93 0 "Turn off utilities after quake" NOT selected 60.3 141 1 "Turn off utilities after quake" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/44 February 16, 2006 Page 14 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR039 Earthquake advice - Hang up phone PCT N VALUE LABEL 58.5 137 0 "Hang up phone after quake" NOT selected 41.5 97 1 "Hang up phone after quake" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/45 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR040 Earthquake advice - Don't use phone except for injury PCT N VALUE LABEL 44.9 105 0 x 55.1 129 1 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/46 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR041 Earthquake advice - Learn how to prevent fires PCT N VALUE LABEL 57.7 135 0 "Learn how to prevent fires" NOT selected 42.3 99 1 "Learn how to prevent fires" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/47 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 15 VAR042 Earthquake advice - Keep fire extinguisher handy PCT N VALUE LABEL 46.2 108 0 "Keep fire extinguisher handy" NOT selected 53.8 126 1 "Keep fire extinguisher handy" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/48 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR043 Earthquake advice - heavy objects off high shelfs. PCT N VALUE LABEL 52.1 122 0 "Move heavy objects off high shelves" NOT selected 47.9 112 1 "Move heavy objects off high shelves" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/49 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR044 Earthquake advice - Don't use vehicle unless in emergency PCT N VALUE LABEL 54.7 128 0 + 45.3 106 1 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/50 February 16, 2006 Page 16 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR045 Earthquake advice - Anchor house to foundation PCT N VALUE LABEL 65.8 154 0 "Anchor house to foundation" NOT selected 34.2 80 1 "Anchor house to foundation" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/51 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR046 Earthquake advice - Buy earthquake insurance PCT N VALUE LABEL 69.2 162 0 "Buy earthquake insurance" NOT selected 30.8 72 1 "Buy earthquake insurance" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/52 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR047 Earthquake advice - Strap down hot water heater PCT N VALUE LABEL 56.0 131 0 "Strap down hot water heater" NOT selected 44.0 103 1 "Strap down hot water heater" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/53 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 17 VAR048 Earthquake advice - Protect dishes and glassware PCT N VALUE LABEL 60.7 142 0 "Protect dishes and glassware" NOT selected 39.3 92 1 "Protect dishes and glassware" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/54 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR049 Earthquake advice - Secure heavy furniture to walls PCT N VALUE LABEL 59.8 140 0 "Secure heavy furniture to walls" NOT selected 40.2 94 1 "Secure heavy furniture to walls" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/55 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR050 Earthquake advice - Where to get more equake info PCT N VALUE LABEL 59.0 138 0 "Learn where to get more quake info" NOT selected 41.0 96 1 "Learn where to get more quake info" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/56 February 16, 2006 Page 18 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR051 Earthquake advice - Form neighborhood watch groups PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.5 165 0 "Form neighborhood watch groups for quake prep" NOT selected 29.5 69 1 "Form neighborhood watch groups for quake prep" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/57 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR052 Earthquake advice - Study emergency plan at work PCT N VALUE LABEL 60.3 141 0 "Study emergency plans at work" NOT selected 39.7 93 1 "Study emergency plans at work" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/58 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR053 Earthquake advice - Study child's school's emergency plan PCT N VALUE LABEL 59.4 139 0 "Study childs shool emergency plan" NOT selected 40.6 95 1 "Study childs shool emergency plan" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/59 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 19 VAR054 Total mitigation choices (var 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) PCT N VALUE LABEL 44.4 104 0 9.0 21 1 6.8 16 2 3.8 9 3 3.8 9 4 5.6 13 5 26.5 62 6 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 6 Input location: 1/60 February 16, 2006 Page 20 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR055 Total preparedness choices(vars 1-16, 18, 24-27) PCT N VALUE LABEL 34.6 81 0 0.9 2 3 0.4 1 4 1.3 3 5 0.9 2 6 1.3 3 7 1.3 3 8 1.7 4 9 2.1 5 10 2.6 6 11 1.7 4 12 3.4 8 13 4.3 10 14 1.3 3 15 3.8 9 16 1.7 4 17 3.8 9 18 4.7 11 19 2.6 6 20 25.6 60 21 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 21 Input location: 1/61-62 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 21 VAR056 Total guidance choices PCT N VALUE LABEL 34.6 81 0 0.4 1 3 0.4 1 4 1.3 3 5 0.9 2 6 0.9 2 7 0.9 2 8 1.3 3 9 1.3 3 10 2.6 6 11 1.7 4 12 3.0 7 13 2.1 5 14 3.4 8 15 2.1 5 16 0.9 2 17 2.1 5 18 0.9 2 19 3.0 7 20 3.8 9 21 0.4 1 22 2.1 5 23 1.3 3 24 3.0 7 25 2.1 5 26 23.5 55 27 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 27 Input location: 1/63-64 February 16, 2006 Page 22 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR057 Warning time PCT N VALUE LABEL 62.8 147 0 "Public may receive 72 hour warning period" NOT selected 37.2 87 1 "Public may receive 72 hour warning period" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/65 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR058 Warning source - State/Local officials PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.5 165 0 "Warning will be announced over radio/TV/..." NOT selected 29.5 69 1 "Warning will be announced over radio/TV/..." WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/66 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR059 Warning medium - Over radio/TV/Newspapers PCT N VALUE LABEL 62.4 146 0 "Warning will be announced over radio/TV/..." NOT selected 37.6 88 1 "Warning will be announced over radio/TV/..." WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/67 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 23 VAR060 Warning - Telephone hotline number will be provided PCT N VALUE LABEL 79.1 185 0 "A phone hotline number will be provided" NOT selected 20.9 49 1 "A phone hotline number will be provided" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/68 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR061 Warning followed by other info on radio/TV/Newspapers PCT N VALUE LABEL 65.8 154 0 "Warning followed by info over radio..." NOT selected 34.2 80 1 "Warning followed by info over radio..." WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/69 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR062 Warning will likely be cancelled within 72 hours PCT N VALUE LABEL 75.2 176 0 "Warning will be cancelled within 72 hrs" NOT selected 24.8 58 1 "Warning will be cancelled within 72 hrs" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/70 February 16, 2006 Page 24 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR063 Warning - Several 72 hour warnings will be issued PCT N VALUE LABEL 75.2 176 0 "Several 72 hr warnings may be issues" NOT selected 24.8 58 1 "Several 72 hr warnings may be issues" NOT selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/71 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR064 Warning - total number PCT N VALUE LABEL 51.7 121 0 9.0 21 1 6.0 14 2 5.6 13 3 5.1 12 4 2.6 6 5 2.6 6 6 17.5 41 7 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 7 Input location: 1/72 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 25 VAR065 Inter message consistency - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 4.4 6 1 No, different sources said different things 3.0 4 2 The different sources were fairly inconsistent w/ each other 22.2 30 3 Unsure 36.3 49 4 The different sources were fairly consistent w/ each other 34.1 46 5 Yes, the different sources said much the same thing 99 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 5 Input location: 1/73 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR066 Inter message consistency - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 29.6 40 0 No, said diff things/ or fairly inconsistent / or unsure 70.4 95 1 Fairly consistent with each other / Yes / said same thing 99 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/74 February 16, 2006 Page 26 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR067 How easy to understand all prediction information - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Very difficult to understand 2.1 3 2 Difficult to understand 19.6 28 3 Unsure / it varied 51.0 73 4 Easy to understand 27.3 39 5 Very easy to understand 91 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 2 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 5 Input location: 1/75 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR068 How easy to understand all prediction information - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 21.7 31 0 Very difficult to understand, or difficult or unsure/varied 78.3 112 1 Easy to understand, or very easy to understand 91 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/76 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR069 Information channel for prediction - TV PCT N VALUE LABEL 52.1 122 0 "Television" NOT selected 47.9 112 1 "Television" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/77 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 27 VAR070 Information channel for prediction - Radio PCT N VALUE LABEL 87.2 204 0 "Radio" NOT selected 12.8 30 1 "Radio" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/78 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR071 Information channel for prediction - Newspaper PCT N VALUE LABEL 59.8 140 0 "Newspaper" NOT selected 40.2 94 1 "Newspaper" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/79 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR072 Information channel for prediction - Magazines PCT N VALUE LABEL 94.0 220 0 "Magazines" NOT selected 6.0 14 1 "Magazines" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/80 February 16, 2006 Page 28 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR073 Information channel for prediction - Brochures PCT N VALUE LABEL 77.4 181 0 "Brochures" NOT selected 22.6 53 1 "Brochures" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/81 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR074 Information channel for prediction - Posters PCT N VALUE LABEL 98.7 231 0 "Posters" NOT selected 1.3 3 1 "Posters" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/82 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR075 Information channel for prediction - Meetings PCT N VALUE LABEL 88.9 208 0 "Meetings/seminars/workshops..." NOT selected 11.1 26 1 "Meetings/seminars/workshops..." WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/83 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 29 VAR076 Information channel for prediction - Reports PCT N VALUE LABEL 86.3 202 0 "Reports / Journal Articles" NOT selected 13.7 32 1 "Reports / Journal Articles" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/84 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR077 Information channel for prediction - Books PCT N VALUE LABEL 94.9 222 0 "Comic books/coloring books/telephone books" NOT selected 5.1 12 1 "Comic books/coloring books/telephone books" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/85 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR078 Information channel for prediction - Informal conversation PCT N VALUE LABEL 85.9 201 0 "Informal conversation" NOT selected 14.1 33 1 "Informal conversation" WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/86 February 16, 2006 Page 30 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR079 Number of information channels for prediction PCT N VALUE LABEL 34.2 80 0 14.5 34 1 22.2 52 2 12.8 30 3 7.3 17 4 3.4 8 5 1.7 4 6 2.6 6 7 0.9 2 8 0.4 1 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 9 Input location: 1/87 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR080 Source of prediction information - Familiar source PCT N VALUE LABEL 79.9 187 0 Friends, relatives, neighbors... NOT selected 20.1 47 1 Friends, relatives, neighbors... WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/88 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR081 Source of prediction information - Government source PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.1 164 0 City / County / State / Federal gov't NOT selected 29.9 70 1 City / County / State / Federal gov't WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/89 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 31 VAR082 Source of prediction information - Scientist PCT N VALUE LABEL 94.4 221 0 Scientists NOT selected 5.6 13 1 Scientists WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/90 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR083 Source of prediction information - Other PCT N VALUE LABEL 77.8 182 0 Fire dept / hospital / school... NOT selected 22.2 52 1 Fire dept / hospital / school... WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/91 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR084 Source of prediction information - Red Cross PCT N VALUE LABEL 94.9 222 0 Red Cross NOT selected 5.1 12 1 Red Cross WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/92 February 16, 2006 Page 32 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR085 Source of prediction information - Media organization PCT N VALUE LABEL 53.4 125 0 Media Organization (TV/radio/newspaper) NOT selected 46.6 109 1 Media Organization (TV/radio/newspaper) WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/93 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR086 Number of sources of prediction information PCT N VALUE LABEL 36.3 85 0 23.9 56 1 18.4 43 2 6.4 15 3 6.4 15 4 2.6 6 5 2.6 6 6 1.3 3 7 0.9 2 8 0.9 2 10 0.4 1 12 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 12 Input location: 1/94-95 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 33 VAR087 Future information source - First mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 15.4 32 1 Television 0.5 1 2 Radio 17.3 36 3 Newspaper 0.0 0 4 Magazines 61.1 127 5 Brochures 0.0 0 6 Posters 0.5 1 7 Meetings 0.0 0 8 Comic books / coloring books 0.5 1 9 Seminars, classes, workshops 0.0 0 10 Reports 0.0 0 11 Journal articles 0.0 0 12 Exhibits, demostrations 0.0 0 13 Informal conversations 0.0 0 14 Speeches, talks 0.5 1 15 Telephone book 0.5 1 16 Slide shows and films 3.8 8 17 Other ; all of the above ; any source 26 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 17 Input location: 1/96-97 February 16, 2006 Page 34 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR088 Future information source - Second mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 27.3 21 1 Television 14.3 11 2 Radio 28.6 22 3 Newspaper 1.3 1 4 Magazines 15.6 12 5 Brochures 0.0 0 6 Posters 1.3 1 7 Meetings 0.0 0 8 Comic books / coloring books 0.0 0 9 Seminars, classes, workshops 0.0 0 10 Reports 3.9 3 11 Journal articles 1.3 1 12 Exhibits, demostrations 0.0 0 13 Informal conversations 0.0 0 14 Speeches, talks 1.3 1 15 Telephone book 1.3 1 16 Slide shows and films 3.9 3 17 Other ; all of the above ; any source 157 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 17 Input location: 1/98-99 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 35 VAR089 Future information source - Third mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 3.7 1 0 18.5 5 1 Television 18.5 5 2 Radio 29.6 8 3 Newspaper 11.1 3 4 Magazines 11.1 3 5 Brochures 0.0 0 6 Posters 3.7 1 7 Meetings 0.0 0 8 Comic books / coloring books 0.0 0 9 Seminars, classes, workshops 0.0 0 10 Reports 0.0 0 11 Journal articles 0.0 0 12 Exhibits, demostrations 0.0 0 13 Informal conversations 0.0 0 14 Speeches, talks 0.0 0 15 Telephone book 0.0 0 16 Slide shows and films 3.7 1 17 Other ; all of the above ; any source 207 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 17 Input location: 1/100-101 February 16, 2006 Page 36 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR090 Future information source - Fourth mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 9.1 1 0 0.0 0 1 Television 9.1 1 2 Radio 45.5 5 3 Newspaper 0.0 0 4 Magazines 18.2 2 5 Brochures 0.0 0 6 Posters 0.0 0 7 Meetings 0.0 0 8 Comic books / coloring books 0.0 0 9 Seminars, classes, workshops 0.0 0 10 Reports 0.0 0 11 Journal articles 0.0 0 12 Exhibits, demostrations 0.0 0 13 Informal conversations 0.0 0 14 Speeches, talks 0.0 0 15 Telephone book 0.0 0 16 Slide shows and films 18.2 2 17 Other ; all of the above ; any source 223 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 17 Input location: 1/102-103 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 37 VAR091 Preferred future information source - First mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 48.0 97 1 City government 2.5 5 2 County government 6.9 14 3 State government 1.0 2 4 Federal government 2.0 4 5 Fire department 0.0 0 6 Hospital 9.9 20 7 Public school 0.5 1 8 Community college 0.0 0 9 Public library 0.0 0 10 Utility company 0.0 0 11 Telephone company 1.0 2 12 American Red Cross 0.0 0 13 Service clubs, associations 9.4 19 14 Media organizations (TV, radio, newspaper) 0.5 1 15 Local businesses 0.0 0 16 Friends, relatives, neighbors, acquaintances 7.9 16 17 Scientists 10.4 21 18 Other ; anyone who knows facts 32 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 18 Input location: 1/104-105 February 16, 2006 Page 38 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR092 Preferred future information source - Second mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 9.2 12 1 City government 73.3 96 2 County government 2.3 3 3 State government 2.3 3 4 Federal government 0.8 1 5 Fire department 1.5 2 6 Hospital 3.1 4 7 Public school 0.0 0 8 Community college 0.0 0 9 Public library 1.5 2 10 Utility company 0.0 0 11 Telephone company 0.0 0 12 American Red Cross 0.8 1 13 Service clubs, associations 2.3 3 14 Media organizations (TV, radio, newspaper) 0.8 1 15 Local businesses 0.0 0 16 Friends, relatives, neighbors, acquaintances 0.8 1 17 Scientists 1.5 2 18 Other ; anyone who knows facts 103 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 18 Input location: 1/106-107 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 39 VAR093 Preferred future information source - Third mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 3.2 2 1 City government 16.1 10 2 County government 24.2 15 3 State government 0.0 0 4 Federal government 6.5 4 5 Fire department 0.0 0 6 Hospital 11.3 7 7 Public school 0.0 0 8 Community college 0.0 0 9 Public library 1.6 1 10 Utility company 0.0 0 11 Telephone company 3.2 2 12 American Red Cross 1.6 1 13 Service clubs, associations 11.3 7 14 Media organizations (TV, radio, newspaper) 1.6 1 15 Local businesses 0.0 0 16 Friends, relatives, neighbors, acquaintances 12.9 8 17 Scientists 6.5 4 18 Other ; anyone who knows facts 172 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 18 Input location: 1/108-109 February 16, 2006 Page 40 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR094 Preferred future information source - Fourth mention PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 City government 5.3 1 2 County government 10.5 2 3 State government 26.3 5 4 Federal government 5.3 1 5 Fire department 10.5 2 6 Hospital 5.3 1 7 Public school 0.0 0 8 Community college 0.0 0 9 Public library 5.3 1 10 Utility company 0.0 0 11 Telephone company 0.0 0 12 American Red Cross 0.0 0 13 Service clubs, associations 5.3 1 14 Media organizations (TV, radio, newspaper) 0.0 0 15 Local businesses 0.0 0 16 Friends, relatives, neighbors, acquaintances 10.5 2 17 Scientists 15.8 3 18 Other ; anyone who knows facts 215 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 2 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 18 Input location: 1/110-111 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR095 How easy to understand brochure sent to home - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 48.6 103 0 Didn't get one 0.5 1 1 Very difficult to understand 1.4 3 2 Difficult to understand 5.2 11 3 Unsure 27.8 59 4 Easy to understand 16.5 35 5 Very easy to understand 22 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 5 Input location: 1/112 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 41 VAR096 How easy to understand brochure sent to home - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 13.8 15 0 Very difficult, or difficult, or Unsure 86.2 94 1 Easy or very easy 125 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/113 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR097 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 8.5 12 1 Don't Know / don't remember 4.2 6 2 Negative: increases worry/makes people scared (affective) 1.4 2 3 Negative: people will panic (behavioral) 0.0 0 4 Negative: cause wild guessing (cognitive) 2.1 3 5 Negative: science not exact enough (disbelief in efficacy) 0.0 0 6 Negative: religio-natural orientation 2.8 4 7 Negative: won't do any good 2.1 3 10 Other Negative 0.0 0 20 Neutral: predictions can't prevent equakes 1.4 2 21 Neutral: everyone forgets about predictions 1.4 2 22 Neither positive nor negative consequences 0.0 0 30 Positive: provides secure feeling 0.7 1 31 Positive: if correct, will help improve quake prediction 0.0 0 32 Positive: would rather have false alarms than big surprise 2.1 3 33 Positive: develops an earthquake consciousness 0.0 0 34 Positive: helps to know where and when it will hit 66.2 94 35 Positive: increases public awareness / preparedness 2.8 4 36 Positive: could save lives and property 4.2 6 40 Other Positive 92 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 40 Input location: 1/114-115 February 16, 2006 Page 42 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR098 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 4.8 1 1 Don't Know / don't remember 9.5 2 2 Negative: increases worry/makes people scared (affective) 14.3 3 3 Negative: people will panic (behavioral) 0.0 0 4 Negative: cause wild guessing (cognitive) 14.3 3 5 Negative: science not exact enough (disbelief in efficacy) 9.5 2 6 Negative: religio-natural orientation 4.8 1 7 Negative: won't do any good 4.8 1 10 Other Negative 0.0 0 20 Neutral: predictions can't prevent equakes 9.5 2 21 Neutral: everyone forgets about predictions 4.8 1 22 Neither positive nor negative consequences 0.0 0 30 Positive: provides secure feeling 0.0 0 31 Positive: if correct, will help improve quake prediction 0.0 0 32 Positive: would rather have false alarms than big surprise 4.8 1 33 Positive: develops an earthquake consciousness 0.0 0 34 Positive: helps to know where and when it will hit 9.5 2 35 Positive: increases public awareness / preparedness 4.8 1 36 Positive: could save lives and property 4.8 1 40 Other Positive 213 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 40 Input location: 1/116-117 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 43 VAR099 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Don't Know / don't remember 0.0 0 2 Negative: increases worry/makes people scared (affective) 0.0 0 3 Negative: people will panic (behavioral) 0.0 0 4 Negative: cause wild guessing (cognitive) 0.0 0 5 Negative: science not exact enough (disbelief in efficacy) 0.0 0 6 Negative: religio-natural orientation 66.7 2 7 Negative: won't do any good 0.0 0 10 Other Negative 0.0 0 20 Neutral: predictions can't prevent equakes 0.0 0 21 Neutral: everyone forgets about predictions 0.0 0 22 Neither positive nor negative consequences 0.0 0 30 Positive: provides secure feeling 0.0 0 31 Positive: if correct, will help improve quake prediction 0.0 0 32 Positive: would rather have false alarms than big surprise 0.0 0 33 Positive: develops an earthquake consciousness 0.0 0 34 Positive: helps to know where and when it will hit 33.3 1 35 Positive: increases public awareness / preparedness 0.0 0 36 Positive: could save lives and property 0.0 0 40 Other Positive 231 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 7 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 35 Input location: 1/118-119 February 16, 2006 Page 44 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR100 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 4 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Don't Know / don't remember 100.0 1 2 Negative: increases worry/makes people scared (affective) 0.0 0 3 Negative: people will panic (behavioral) 0.0 0 4 Negative: cause wild guessing (cognitive) 0.0 0 5 Negative: science not exact enough (disbelief in efficacy) 0.0 0 6 Negative: religio-natural orientation 0.0 0 7 Negative: won't do any good 0.0 0 10 Other Negative 0.0 0 20 Neutral: predictions can't prevent equakes 0.0 0 21 Neutral: everyone forgets about predictions 0.0 0 22 Neither positive nor negative consequences 0.0 0 30 Positive: provides secure feeling 0.0 0 31 Positive: if correct, will help improve quake prediction 0.0 0 32 Positive: would rather have false alarms than big surprise 0.0 0 33 Positive: develops an earthquake consciousness 0.0 0 34 Positive: helps to know where and when it will hit 0.0 0 35 Positive: increases public awareness / preparedness 0.0 0 36 Positive: could save lives and property 0.0 0 40 Other Positive 233 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 2 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 2 Input location: 1/120-121 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR101 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 5 PCT N VALUE LABEL 87.2 204 0 No negative consequences listed 12.8 30 1 Negative consequences listed --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/122 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 45 VAR102 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 6 PCT N VALUE LABEL 52.6 123 0 No positive consequences listed 47.4 111 1 Positive consequences listed --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/123 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR103 Perceived impacts of having prediction - 7 PCT N VALUE LABEL 44.9 105 0 No consequences listed 55.1 129 1 Consequences listed --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/124 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR104 Should scientists continue prediction work? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 4.5 10 1 No 7.2 16 2 Don't Know 88.3 196 3 Yes 12 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/125 February 16, 2006 Page 46 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR105 Should scientists continue prediction work? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 11.7 26 0 No or Don't know 88.3 196 1 Yes 12 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/126 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR106 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 1.2 2 1 Disbelief in efficacy 1.9 3 2 No: Religio-natural orientation 0.6 1 3 2.5 4 5 No: other 0.6 1 7 25.6 41 10 Yes: Could save lives and property 34.4 55 11 Yes: Can increase preparedness/public safefy 13.8 22 12 Yes: Increases awareness 1.9 3 13 Yes: Would know when to vacate 0.0 0 14 Yes: Would save energy and emotions 11.2 18 15 Yes: Need to work on it to see if works 1.2 2 16 Yes: Intelligent approach 5.0 8 20 Other 74 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 20 Input location: 1/127-128 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 47 VAR107 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Disbelief in efficacy 0.0 0 2 No: Religio-natural orientation 5.6 1 3 11.1 2 5 No: other 11.1 2 10 Yes: Could save lives and property 27.8 5 11 Yes: Can increase preparedness/public safefy 27.8 5 12 Yes: Increases awareness 0.0 0 13 Yes: Would know when to vacate 0.0 0 14 Yes: Would save energy and emotions 5.6 1 15 Yes: Need to work on it to see if works 0.0 0 16 Yes: Intelligent approach 11.1 2 20 Other 216 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 3 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 20 Input location: 1/129-130 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR108 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.0 0 1 Disbelief in efficacy 0.0 0 2 No: Religio-natural orientation 0.0 0 5 No: other 0.0 0 10 Yes: Could save lives and property 0.0 0 11 Yes: Can increase preparedness/public safefy 0.0 0 12 Yes: Increases awareness 100.0 1 13 Yes: Would know when to vacate 0.0 0 14 Yes: Would save energy and emotions 0.0 0 15 Yes: Need to work on it to see if works 0.0 0 16 Yes: Intelligent approach 0.0 0 20 Other 233 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 13 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 13 Input location: 1/131-132 February 16, 2006 Page 48 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR109 Why do you feel scientists should continue? - 4 PCT N VALUE LABEL 0 1 Disbelief in efficacy 0 2 No: Religio-natural orientation 0 5 No: other 0 10 Yes: Could save lives and property 0 11 Yes: Can increase preparedness/public safefy 0 12 Yes: Increases awareness 0 13 Yes: Would know when to vacate 0 14 Yes: Would save energy and emotions 0 15 Yes: Need to work on it to see if works 0 16 Yes: Intelligent approach 0 20 Other 234 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: NA MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: NA Input location: 1/133-134 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR110 What magnitude do you predict quake will be? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 1.5 3 0 Don't know 1.0 2 1 Less than magnitude 4 0.5 1 2 About magnitude 4 5.0 10 3 About magnitude 5 23.5 47 4 About magnitude 6 21.0 42 5 About magnitude 7 4.0 8 6 About magnitude 8 43.5 87 7 Don't believe it will happen 34 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 7 Input location: 1/135 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 49 VAR111 What magnitude do you predict quake will be? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 55.5 111 0 Any answer except magnitude 6 or 7 44.5 89 1 Magnitude 7 or magnitude 7 34 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/136 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR112 How far will your house be from epicenter? (miles) 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 999 Decimals: 0 Max: 300 Input location: 1/137-140 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR113 Likelihood of future earthquake event - 1 (For Parkfield) PCT N VALUE LABEL 19.8 26 0 I don't believe any of these statements 25.2 33 1 I will experience a quake that'll causes me economic loss 10.7 14 2 I will exp a quake that'll cause me/family physical harm 23.7 31 3 In next few years I'll experience ecomic loss in quake 20.6 27 4 In next few years, I/family will exp quake causes phys harm 103 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/141 February 16, 2006 Page 50 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR114 Likelihood of future earthquake event - 2 (For other) PCT N VALUE LABEL 17.6 33 0 I don't believe any of these statements 21.9 41 1 I will experience a quake that'll causes me economic loss 14.4 27 2 I will exp a quake that'll cause me/family physical harm 25.7 48 3 In next few years I'll experience ecomic loss in quake 20.3 38 4 In next few years, I/family will exp quake causes phys harm 47 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/142 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR115 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 86.8 203 0 Sought prediction info from govt orgs NOT selected 13.2 31 1 Sought prediction info from govt orgs WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/143 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR116 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 86.3 202 0 Sought prediction info from non-gov't orgs NOT selected 13.7 32 1 Sought prediction info from non-gov't orgs WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/144 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 51 VAR117 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 53.8 126 0 Talked with other people about prediction NOT selected 46.2 108 1 Talked with other people about prediction WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/145 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR118 Information acquisition since hearing prediction - 4 PCT N VALUE LABEL 75.6 177 0 Done no info seeking behavior NOT selected 24.4 57 1 Done no info seeking behavior WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/146 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR119 Information acquisition items selected (V115-117) PCT N VALUE LABEL 46.6 109 0 36.3 85 1 14.1 33 2 3.0 7 3 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/147 February 16, 2006 Page 52 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR120 Response before - acquire info from Government PCT N VALUE LABEL 85.5 200 0 Sought info before from government NOT selected 14.5 34 1 Sought info before from government WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/148 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR121 Response before - acquire info from Non-government PCT N VALUE LABEL 84.2 197 0 Sought info before from non-governmental source NOT selected 15.8 37 1 Sought info before from non-governmental source WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/149 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR122 Response before - acquired info by talking to people PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 0 Sought info before by talking with other people NOT selected 27.8 65 1 Sought info before by talking with other people WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/150 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 53 VAR123 Response before - bought earthquake insurance PCT N VALUE LABEL 84.2 197 0 Prepared before by buying e'quake insurance NOT selected 15.8 37 1 Prepared before by buying e'quake insurance WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/151 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR124 Response before - cancelled or delayed big purchases PCT N VALUE LABEL 100.0 234 0 Prepared before by cancel/delay big purchase NOT selected 0.0 0 1 Prepared before by cancel/delay big purchase WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 0 Input location: 1/152 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR125 Response before - cancelled or delayed investments PCT N VALUE LABEL 100.0 234 0 Prepared before by cancel/delay investment NOT selected 0.0 0 1 Prepared before by cancel/delay investment WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 0 Input location: 1/153 February 16, 2006 Page 54 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR126 Response before - saved more money PCT N VALUE LABEL 97.0 227 0 Prepared before by saving more money NOT selected 3.0 7 1 Prepared before by saving more money WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/154 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR127 Response before - secured items in house PCT N VALUE LABEL 85.5 200 0 Prepared before by securing items in house NOT selected 14.5 34 1 Prepared before by securing items in house WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/155 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR128 Response before - made house more earthquake resistant PCT N VALUE LABEL 91.0 213 0 Prep before: made house more equake resistant NOT selected 9.0 21 1 Prep before: made house more equake resistant WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/156 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 55 VAR129 Response before - stockpiled emergency supplies PCT N VALUE LABEL 69.2 162 0 Prep before: stockpiled emergency supplies NOT selected 30.8 72 1 Prep before: stockpiled emergency supplies WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/157 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR130 Response before - developed family emergency plan PCT N VALUE LABEL 81.2 190 0 Prep before: developed family emergency plan NOT selected 18.8 44 1 Prep before: developed family emergency plan WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/158 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR131 Response before - formed neighborhood watch PCT N VALUE LABEL 99.6 233 0 Prep before: formed neighborhood watch NOT selected 0.4 1 1 Prep before: formed neighborhood watch WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/159 February 16, 2006 Page 56 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR132 Response before - other community activity PCT N VALUE LABEL 99.6 233 0 Prep before: other community activity NOT selected 0.4 1 1 Prep before: other community activity WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/160 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR133 Response before - got info on preparedness response PCT N VALUE LABEL 54.3 127 0 Prep before: got info on prep response NOT selected 45.7 107 1 Prep before: got info on prep response WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/161 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR134 Response before - learned first aid PCT N VALUE LABEL 75.2 176 0 Prep before: learned first aid NOT selected 24.8 58 1 Prep before: learned first aid WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/162 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 57 VAR135 Response before - Information scale (V120-122) PCT N VALUE LABEL 64.5 151 0 18.8 44 1 10.7 25 2 6.0 14 3 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/163 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR136 Response before - mitigation scale (V123-128) PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 0 17.1 40 1 7.3 17 2 3.0 7 3 0.4 1 4 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/164 February 16, 2006 Page 58 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR137 Response before - preparedness scale (V129-134) PCT N VALUE LABEL 44.4 104 0 19.2 45 1 17.1 40 2 9.8 23 3 9.0 21 4 0.4 1 5 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 5 Input location: 1/165 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR138 Number of responses before hearing prediction PCT N VALUE LABEL 39.3 92 0 11.5 27 1 13.7 32 2 7.3 17 3 9.0 21 4 6.0 14 5 5.1 12 6 3.0 7 7 2.6 6 8 1.3 3 9 1.3 3 10 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 10 Input location: 1/166-167 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 59 VAR139 Response after - acquire infro from government PCT N VALUE LABEL 90.6 212 0 Prep after: sought info to get ready from gov't NOT selected 9.4 22 1 Prep after: sought info to get ready from gov't WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/168 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR140 Response after - acquire info from non-government PCT N VALUE LABEL 91.0 213 0 Prep after: sought get ready info from non-gov't NOT select 9.0 21 1 Prep after: sought get ready info from non-gov't WAS select --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/169 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR141 Response after - acquired info by talking to people PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 0 Prep after: talked to people for get ready info NOT selected 27.8 65 1 Prep after: talked to people for get ready info WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/170 February 16, 2006 Page 60 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR142 Response after - bought earthquake insurance PCT N VALUE LABEL 89.3 209 0 Prep after: got ready buying e'quake insurance NOT selected 10.7 25 1 Prep after: got ready buying e'quake insurance WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/171 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR143 Response after - cancelled or delayed big purchases PCT N VALUE LABEL 99.1 232 0 Prep after: cancel/delay big purchases NOT selected 0.9 2 1 Prep after: cancel/delay big purchases WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/172 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR144 Response after - cancelled or delayed investments PCT N VALUE LABEL 98.7 231 0 Prep after: calcel/delay investments NOT selected 1.3 3 1 Prep after: calcel/delay investments WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/173 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 61 VAR145 Response after - saved more money PCT N VALUE LABEL 94.0 220 0 Prep after: saved more money NOT selected 6.0 14 1 Prep after: saved more money WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/174 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR146 Response after - secured items in house PCT N VALUE LABEL 86.8 203 0 Prep after: secured items in house NOT selected 13.2 31 1 Prep after: secured items in house WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/175 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR147 Response after - made house more earthquake resistant PCT N VALUE LABEL 93.6 219 0 Prep after: house more equake resistant NOT selected 6.4 15 1 Prep after: house more equake resistant WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/176 February 16, 2006 Page 62 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR148 Response after - stockpiled emergency supplies PCT N VALUE LABEL 75.6 177 0 Prep after: stockpiled emergency supplies NOT selected 24.4 57 1 Prep after: stockpiled emergency supplies WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/177 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR149 Response after - developed family emergency plan PCT N VALUE LABEL 87.6 205 0 Prep after: developed family emergency plan NOT selected 12.4 29 1 Prep after: developed family emergency plan WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/178 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR150 Response after - formed neighborhood watch PCT N VALUE LABEL 99.1 232 0 Prep after: formed neighborhood watch NOT selected 0.9 2 1 Prep after: formed neighborhood watch WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/179 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 63 VAR151 Response after - other community activity PCT N VALUE LABEL 97.0 227 0 Prep after: other neighborhood activity NOT selected 3.0 7 1 Prep after: other neighborhood activity WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/180 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR152 Response after - got info on preparedness response PCT N VALUE LABEL 72.2 169 0 Prep after: got info on response prep NOT selected 27.8 65 1 Prep after: got info on response prep WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/181 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR153 Response after - learned first aid PCT N VALUE LABEL 91.0 213 0 Prep after: learned first aid NOT selected 9.0 21 1 Prep after: learned first aid WAS selected --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/182 February 16, 2006 Page 64 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR154 Response after - Information scale (V139-141) PCT N VALUE LABEL 69.2 162 0 18.8 44 1 8.5 20 2 3.4 8 3 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/183 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR155 Response after - mitigation scale (V142-147) PCT N VALUE LABEL 77.8 182 0 14.1 33 1 3.4 8 2 3.0 7 3 0.9 2 4 0.9 2 6 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 6 Input location: 1/184 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 65 VAR156 Response after - preparedness scale (V148-153) PCT N VALUE LABEL 61.1 143 0 15.8 37 1 13.7 32 2 5.1 12 3 3.0 7 4 0.9 2 5 0.4 1 6 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 6 Input location: 1/185 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR157 Number of response after hearing prediction PCT N VALUE LABEL 53.8 126 0 7.7 18 1 12.0 28 2 9.4 22 3 6.0 14 4 2.6 6 5 3.8 9 6 1.7 4 7 0.4 1 8 0.4 1 9 0.9 2 10 0.4 1 11 0.4 1 13 0.4 1 15 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 15 Input location: 1/186-187 February 16, 2006 Page 66 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR158 Do you know anyone who has done anything to prepare PCT N VALUE LABEL 77.4 181 0 No, or don't know 22.6 53 1 Yes --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/188 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR159 Do you feel your household is adequately prepared PCT N VALUE LABEL 80.6 183 0 No, or don't know, unsure 19.4 44 1 Yes 7 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/189 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR160 Do you feel your community is adequately prepared PCT N VALUE LABEL 91.2 208 0 No, don't know, usure 8.8 20 1 Yes 6 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/190 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 67 VAR161 Experience with 1966 Parkfield earthquake PCT N VALUE LABEL 74.3 156 0 I didn't experience it 17.6 37 1 I felt it 6.7 14 2 I had friends/relatives with damage from it 1.4 3 3 I had damage from it 24 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/191 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR162 Experience with 1983 Coalinga eqarthquake PCT N VALUE LABEL 32.9 73 0 I didn't experience it 43.2 96 1 I felt it 20.7 46 2 I had friends/relatives with damage from it 3.2 7 3 I had damage from it 12 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/192 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR163 Have you experience earthquake except '66 or '83? PCT N VALUE LABEL 17.3 39 0 No 82.7 186 1 Yes 9 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/193 February 16, 2006 Page 68 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR164 Number of years since earthquake (not '66 or '83) occured? PCT N VALUE LABEL 1.9 3 1 3.8 6 2 5.1 8 3 1.3 2 4 1.3 2 5 0.6 1 6 3.2 5 7 1.3 2 8 1.9 3 9 0.6 1 11 1.3 2 14 0.6 1 15 0.6 1 17 1.9 3 18 13.9 22 19 1.3 2 20 1.3 2 22 1.3 2 24 0.6 1 26 0.6 1 32 0.6 1 33 1.3 2 34 2.5 4 35 0.6 1 36 4.4 7 37 36.1 57 38 3.2 5 39 0.6 1 40 1.3 2 42 0.6 1 43 3.2 5 57 1.3 2 58 76 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 58 Input location: 1/194-195 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 69 VAR165 Impact of non '66 or '83 earthquake PCT N VALUE LABEL 27.4 51 0 No or DK, No answers to c,d,&e 15.1 28 1 Damage to buildings selected (but no others selected) 18.8 35 2 Caused injuries selected (but caused death not selected) 38.7 72 3 Caused deaths selected 48 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/196 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR166 Experience will ALL earthquakes PCT N VALUE LABEL 9.2 21 0 No earthquake experience 21.8 50 1 Felt an earthquake 22.3 51 2 Damage 15.3 35 3 Injuries 31.4 72 4 Death 5 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 4 Input location: 1/197 February 16, 2006 Page 70 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR167 Experience with any other natural disaster - type PCT N VALUE LABEL 62.8 147 0 No non-earthquake natural disaster experiences 6.8 16 1 Hurricane 12.8 30 2 Tornado 11.5 27 3 Flood 0.4 1 4 Tsuname (tidal wave) 0.9 2 5 Landslide, mudslide 0.4 1 6 Avalanche 1.7 4 7 Volcanic eruption 2.6 6 8 Other --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 8 Input location: 1/198 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 71 VAR168 Number of years since experience with other natural disaster PCT N VALUE LABEL 2.7 2 2 1.3 1 3 2.7 2 4 5.3 4 5 1.3 1 6 4.0 3 7 2.7 2 8 1.3 1 9 8.0 6 10 2.7 2 11 5.3 4 12 1.3 1 13 1.3 1 14 1.3 1 16 5.3 4 17 2.7 2 18 2.7 2 19 1.3 1 20 4.0 3 21 2.7 2 22 1.3 1 23 4.0 3 24 2.7 2 28 1.3 1 32 2.7 2 33 5.3 4 34 1.3 1 35 1.3 1 38 2.7 2 40 1.3 1 42 5.3 4 45 1.3 1 54 1.3 1 55 1.3 1 56 1.3 1 57 1.3 1 58 1.3 1 62 1.3 1 68 1.3 1 78 159 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 2 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 78 February 16, 2006 Page 72 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Input location: 1/199-200 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR169 Damage to builing in other natural disaster PCT N VALUE LABEL 64.1 150 0 I have not experienced a non-earthquake natural disaster 3.8 9 1 No damage to buildings 13.2 31 2 Some damage to buildings 18.8 44 3 A lot of damage to buildings --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 3 Input location: 1/201 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR170 Sex PCT N VALUE LABEL 38.7 89 1 Male 61.3 141 2 Female 4 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 2 Input location: 1/202 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR171 Do you own or rent your place of residence PCT N VALUE LABEL 24.8 57 0 Rent or other 75.2 173 1 Own 4 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/203 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 73 VAR172 Excluding self, how many people in HH responsible for - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 18.9 43 0 41.9 95 1 17.6 40 2 15.4 35 3 2.6 6 4 1.8 4 5 0.4 1 6 0.9 2 7 0.4 1 9 7 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 9 Input location: 1/204-205 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR173 Excluding self, how many people in HH responsible for - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 18.9 43 0 None 81.1 184 1 Any number 7 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/206 February 16, 2006 Page 74 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR174 Besides own HH, how many family members in community - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 29.8 68 0 3.9 9 1 5.7 13 2 6.6 15 3 7.0 16 4 3.5 8 5 4.4 10 6 4.4 10 7 3.1 7 8 1.3 3 9 5.7 13 10 0.9 2 11 2.2 5 12 1.3 3 13 2.2 5 14 4.8 11 15 0.9 2 16 0.9 2 17 0.4 1 18 0.4 1 19 3.5 8 20 0.9 2 21 0.9 2 22 0.4 1 23 0.4 1 25 0.4 1 26 1.3 3 30 0.4 1 31 0.4 1 35 0.4 1 36 0.4 1 40 0.4 1 50 0.4 1 77 6 9999 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9999 Decimals: 0 Max: 77 Input location: 1/207-210 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 75 VAR175 Besides own HH, how many family members in community - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 29.8 68 0 None 70.2 160 1 Any number 6 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/211 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR176 Number of local organizations you participate in - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 33.6 75 0 29.1 65 1 20.6 46 2 8.5 19 3 4.5 10 4 0.4 1 5 0.4 1 6 0.9 2 7 0.4 1 8 0.9 2 9 0.4 1 18 11 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 18 Input location: 1/212-213 February 16, 2006 Page 76 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR177 Number of local organizations you participate in - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 33.6 75 0 None 66.4 148 1 Any number 11 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/214 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR178 How many years have you lived in your community - 1 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 71 Input location: 1/215-218 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR179 How many years have you lived in your community - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 5.2 12 0 Less than 2 years 94.8 217 1 Two years or more 5 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/219 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 77 VAR180 Occupation of family's chief wage earner PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.9 2 1 Full-time student 1.8 4 2 Housewife 27.9 62 3 Retired 5.0 11 4 Laboring worker (other than farm) 0.0 0 5 Farm laborer, farm helper, or farm foreman 2.7 6 6 Service worker 8.1 18 7 Semi-skilled worker 0.0 0 8 Farm owner, farm manager 16.7 37 9 Skilled trade or craft worker 2.3 5 10 Sales worker 0.9 2 11 Manufacturer's representative 3.6 8 12 Clerical or office worker 10.4 23 13 Runs own business w/ one or more employees 9.0 20 14 Manager, executive, or official 10.8 24 15 Professional worker 12 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 15 Input location: 1/220-221 February 16, 2006 Page 78 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR181 Education PCT N VALUE LABEL 0.4 1 1 Some grammar school 0.9 2 2 Grammar school graduate - 6 years 0.4 1 3 Some junior high 0.9 2 4 Junior high graduate - 8 years 8.7 20 5 Some high school 20.0 46 6 High school graduate - 12 years 3.9 9 7 Some trade/technical school 3.0 7 8 Trade/technical school graduate - 14 years 38.7 89 9 Some college 15.2 35 10 College graduage - 16 years 3.9 9 11 Some graduage school 3.5 8 12 Completed Master's degree - 18 years 0.4 1 13 Completed doctorate degree - 20 years 4 99 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 99 Decimals: 0 Max: 13 Input location: 1/222-223 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR182 Ethnicity - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 4.1 9 1 American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.0 0 2 Asian or Pacific Islander 0.0 0 3 Black, not of Hispanic Origin 2.3 5 4 Hispanic 93.7 207 5 White, not of Hispanic origin 13 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 5 Input location: 1/224 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 79 VAR183 Ethnicity - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 93.7 207 0 White, not of Hispanic origin 6.3 14 1 Any other category 13 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/225 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR184 Age (in years) 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 22 MD Codes: 999 Decimals: 0 Max: 83 Input location: 1/226-228 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR185 Age (over/under 60) PCT N VALUE LABEL 71.1 160 0 Under 60 28.9 65 1 60 and over 9 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/229 February 16, 2006 Page 80 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR186 Age (over/under 25) PCT N VALUE LABEL 98.7 222 0 25 and over 1.3 3 1 Under 25 9 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/230 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR187 Age (<25 and/or >=65) PCT N VALUE LABEL 21.8 49 0 Less thatn 25 or 65 and over 78.2 176 1 25 to 64 9 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/231 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR188 Age (over/under 64) PCT N VALUE LABEL 79.6 179 0 Under 64 20.4 46 1 65 and over 9 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/232 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 81 VAR189 Gross Household income (in dollars) 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 1900 MD Codes: 999999 Decimals: 0 Max: 150000 Input location: 1/233-238 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR190 Gross Household income (over/under $15K) PCT N VALUE LABEL 14.4 25 0 $15,000 and below 85.6 149 1 Above $15,000 60 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/239 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR191 Can phychics/fortune tellers predict earthquakes? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 90.7 206 0 No, don't know 9.3 21 1 Yes 7 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/240 February 16, 2006 Page 82 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft VAR192 Can psychics/fortune tellers predict earthquakes? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.0 159 0 No 30.0 68 1 Don't know, yes 7 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/241 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR193 Can psychics/fortune tellers predice earthquakes? - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 70.0 159 0 No 20.7 47 1 Don't know 9.3 21 2 Yes 7 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 2 Input location: 1/242 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR194 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 1 PCT N VALUE LABEL 18.3 41 0 No 40.2 90 1 Don't know 41.5 93 2 Yes 10 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 2 Input location: 1/243 February 16, 2006 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft Page 83 VAR195 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 2 PCT N VALUE LABEL 58.5 131 0 No 41.5 93 1 Yes 10 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/244 __________________________________________________________________________________________ VAR196 Can scientists predict earthquakes? - 3 PCT N VALUE LABEL 18.3 41 0 No 81.7 183 1 Don't know, yes 10 9 --- 234 cases Type: numeric Min: 0 MD Codes: 9 Decimals: 0 Max: 1 Input location: 1/245 February 16, 2006 Page 84 Parkfield Earthquake Prediction, Spring 1989: Taft February 16, 2006