Beyond the Shadow of the Future:
How Multiple Teams Alter the Dynamics of Cooperation
Corinne Coen


     Reward systems that offer pay and promotion for individual performance while asking people to work on teams for an equal share of the collective reward often create a social dilemma for self-interested employees and thus a disincentive to cooperate.  Yet, competition between teams increases incentives to cooperate within a team, a finding traditionally attributed to group-interest.  This dissertation study attempts to integrate these two observations by investigating whether self-interest can increase cooperation in a social dilemma in a multiple team context.  It examines how people who can compare their performance with the performance of members of other teams alter their decisions to cooperate with their own teammates.  
     This dissertation innovatively uses multiple methods.  First it addresses issues of validity by combining the results of laboratory experiments on human subjects with computer simulations.  The laboratory studies confirm that levels of cooperation increase when comparison is favorable while no significant difference is generated by unfavorable comparisons or differing amounts of pay.  Second, this dissertation employs agent-based computer simulations to study the dynamics of comparisons in two distinct ways.  One application of agent-based modeling reproduces the laboratory experiment to find the decision rule that best describes the choices of individual laboratory subjects.  This model shows that a modified reinforcement rule approximates their decision patterns.  The other application of agent-based modeling explores the effects of comparisons by individuals on outcomes at the team and multi-team level by modeling teams where all members apply the reinforcement rule.  It reveals that as agents increase in self-interest a threshold arises over which cooperation levels jump sharply when the agents are split into two teams but not when they act in a single team.  This dissertation substantiates the role of self-interested comparisons in increasing cooperation on competing work teams and offers insights for improving incentive systems by structuring the information flow among members of multiple teams.