|
Hillary Clinton Meets the Capps (Section 3)
Here is an annotated transcript of the second segment of the greeting
exchange:
The greeting exchange in lines 3-5 conforms to the format described
by conversation analysts as typical of greetings: two adjacent turns
by two speakers:
Speaker A: {greeting}
Speaker B: {greeting}
This format is called adjacency pair.
However, rather than in a clear sequential relation, the two turns
are almost simultaneous, as shown by the sign for overlap (//), although,
as shown below, when we listen more carefully, we discover that Hillary
starts first. This raises a number of interesting questions that can
only be fully answered by becoming familiar with the work on overlaps
and examining a number of other greetings and other types of adjacency
pairs. Research questions-3
When we listen
again to the exchange, we realize that although Todd starts later,
Hillary's lengthening of her "hi" makes it
possible for the two of them to end at the same time. Immediately after
(see the sign "=" for 'latching'), Hillary starts the "how
are you", which is also echoed by Todd's "how are you" (double
obliques are replaced by brackets in version-b to better mark visually
the timing of overlaps).
As we listen again and again to the talk, we realize
that the greeting exchange between Todd and Hillary is not composed
of three turns, as indicated in version-a of the transcript, but of
three consecutive, although partially overlapping adjacency pairs.
The first adjacency pair is the hi/hi sequence, the second one is the
how are you/how are you, which Sacks (1975) called a greeting substitute,
and the third adjacency pair is the parallel nice to see you/nice to
see you:
All three adjacency pairs display an identical parallel
structure with partial overlap. The second part of the nice to see
you pair is followed by a non-reciprocal thanks. This last item of
the exchange raises an interesting question: what is Hillary thanking
Todd for? In fact, this question is included within a more general
question about the entire sequence, namely, how typical is this exchange
or to what extent the social identities of the participants and the
particular occasion in which they meet can explain what is being said?
(See research questions)
|
|